Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, I would like to support what my noble friend has said about the problem of charging for fire advice. When I read the second part of Amendment 113—proposed new subsection (5B)—I thought, ““Well, any fire authority that is able to charge will probably do so””. Is it really the Government’s intention that small businesses, and particularly charities like the Scouts and others that are not for profit, should have to pay for such advice? My experience with such businesses is that it is very hard to start up anyway. I believe that you have to get fire advice in many cases. Having to pay will make life even more difficult. I can understand why the Government want to allow fire authorities to make such charges but to do that for non-profit organisations seems to be a little hard. Perhaps the Minister could reflect on that and consider whether it could be omitted for charities and non-profit organisations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c556-7 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Consumers Advisory services Fees and charges Elections Greater London Greater London Authority Fire and rescue services District councils Local government Protection Planning Public transport Railways Passengers Mayor of London Passenger transport executives London Transport Users' Committee Mayoral development corporations Transport for London Regeneration Economic prosperity boards Mayors
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk