Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
My Lords, the word that I stumbled over when I first read Clause 14(2) was ““just””. Not justice, which of course is important, but ““just because””, which is not the sort of language that one normally sees in legislation. However, since the noble Lord has spoken, and having heard what he said, which I found extremely helpful, the word that now concerns me is ““might””. Clause 14(2)(a) refers to a view that a decision-maker, "““took, or would or might take””." How does ““might”” stand in the context of the distinction between predisposition and predetermination? I am far more confused than I was 10 minutes ago.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c611
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Advisory services Fees and charges Elections Greater London Greater London Authority Fire and rescue services District councils Local government Protection Planning Public transport Railways Passengers Mayor of London Passenger transport executives London Transport Users' Committee Mayoral development corporations Transport for London Regeneration Economic prosperity boards Mayors
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-30 18:35:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768690
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768690
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768690