Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.

Armed Forces Bill

I am sorry to intervene on the Bill and thank the noble Lord for giving way. He made a statement in reply to the point raised by the noble Lord, Lord Williams of Elvel. He said that the usual channels had come to an agreement that there should be voting at Third Reading but that that would not set a precedent. If there is voting at Third Reading, surely that must set a precedent. How will he and other people prevent reference being made to what will be a precedent?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1041 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disciplinary proceedings Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Armed forces Death Crimes of violence Costs Commonwealth Devolution Coroners Advocacy Health Education Drugs Misuse Ombudsman Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration Mental health Malaysia Military decorations Training Young people Resignations Local Government Ombudsman Veterans
Legislation
Armed Forces Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk