Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.


Armed Forces Bill

My Lords, as in Grand Committee, I support every word of my noble and gallant friend Lord Craig. Unlike in Grand Committee, I have not brought my PJM medal with me; nor have I brought my General Service Medal with its clasp, showing that I was involved in confrontation in Borneo, but they are two medals for the same thing. Another aspect of the unfortunate way in which this issue has been handled relates to the veterans who raised the issue of the PJM with the Government. They were, frankly, treated in a way that I would not have expected of the Ministry of Defence. The HDC—the Honours and Decorations Committee—may have met, but if it did so, it did so internally and did not share any of its findings. The letter that was then sent to the veterans was unworthy of the ministry. I am grateful to the noble Lord the Minister for announcing that he is going to revisit this, and I hope that this time there will be proper transparency so that the veterans are aware of the arguments and that they are not just produced in secret and, as my noble and gallant friend has said, erroneously.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1069-70 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Disciplinary proceedings Conditions of employment Alcoholic drinks Disadvantaged Armed forces Death Crimes of violence Costs Commonwealth Devolution Coroners Advocacy Health Education Drugs Misuse Ombudsman Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration Mental health Malaysia Military decorations Training Young people Resignations Local Government Ombudsman Veterans
Legislation
Armed Forces Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk