Proceeding contribution from Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
Is not the point that there is an enormous gap between preventing someone entering a particular area, which is what the schedule permits, and requiring them to live in a particular area where the Security Service can maintain constant surveillance of them? That is the difference between the two, is it not?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c1153
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Crime prevention Courts Detainees Deportation Finance Evidence Human rights Judiciary Exclusion orders Legislation National security Police Powers Parliamentary scrutiny Terrorism Surveillance Telecommunications Travel restrictions Technology Tagging Anti-terrorism control orders Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Freedom of circulation
- Legislation
- Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:16:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_770468
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_770468
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_770468