Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.


Education Bill

My Lords, I also support Amendment 33, which I have added my name to. I will not rehearse the arguments that have been made by noble Lords who have already spoken except to say, as I said in Committee, that these issues about safeguarding are absolutely paramount. There is one area that no one has picked up on but of which I have personal experience. Looked-after children, foster children or children with difficult family arrangements often have complex arrangements at the school gate. For this particular group, it is always vital that the parent with the residency order knows exactly what is happening. My own experience was at primary school level, where the school was fully on board with all the issues. In a large secondary school with 1,200 pupils, I worry that a teacher or head of department handing out a detention might not be aware of such complex arrangements. For such reasons, which also come back to safeguarding, this is really important. Amendment 33 does not ask for much. The key thing from this Side is for the Minister to please look again at the wording. We want a really clear statement that nothing will be done that will compromise the safety of the child. That is the absolute nub of it. We can all give many more anecdotes but fundamentally, at its root, this is about the safeguarding of children.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c245 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Discipline Attendance Parents Pre-school education Pupil exclusions Powers Pupils Standards Vetting Teachers Special educational needs Right of search Reviews
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk