Proceeding contribution from Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education Bill.
Education Bill
43: Clause 13, page 20, line 22, leave out ““an appropriate criminal court”” and insert ““a magistrates’ court”” 44: Clause 13, page 20, line 27, at end insert ““, and (b) the victim of the offence to which the allegation relates.”” 45: Clause 13, page 20, line 28, leave out ““of a magistrates’ court”” 46: Clause 13, page 20, line 30, leave out ““of a magistrates’ court”” 47: Clause 13, page 21, line 3, leave out from ““once”” to end of line 4 and insert ““proceedings for the offence have been instituted.”” Amendments 43 to 47 agreed. Amendment 48 Tabled by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c277-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Discipline Attendance Parents Pre-school education Pupil exclusions Powers Pupils Standards Vetting Teachers Special educational needs Right of search Reviews
- Legislation
- Education Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:33:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_774635
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_774635
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_774635