Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 19 October 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
The noble Baroness probably answered her own question, at least the first one, on what would be substantial. It is similar to the fact that we have put in ““overnight”” but have not defined what ““overnight”” is. We all know what ““overnight”” means; what we are saying is that we do not want that 16-hour curfew, we want people to be able to have a job, should that be necessary, but we need not be specific. This is where the reasonableness of the Secretary of State’s decision comes in. Similarly with the connection: obviously that connection is not just going to be that you have been on a day trip to Blackpool or went to the party conference there many years ago.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 731 c329
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Counter-terrorism Curfews Detainees Human rights Terrorism Terrorism prevention and investigation measures
- Legislation
- Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:22:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775121
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775121
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_775121