---

Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill

I absolutely support what the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, said. My amendments to both his amendments were partly in response to an earlier draft, which I think he changed before tabling them. However, the point remains the same: to tease out whether the words ““if possible”” are objective or subjective to the individual. I am not sure what ““if possible”” means in the context. I would certainly not want anything that the noble Lord has included to detract from the thrust of his important amendments and argument. I beg to move.