Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2011. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.


Welfare Reform Bill

My Lords, having been wonderfully rude about the first probing amendment of the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, I am going to do exactly the opposite now because I regret that he announced that this was a probing amendment. This is the widest power that I have seen for many years in any potential Act of Parliament. Paragraph (d) of Clause 19(2) states that, "““the claimant is of a prescribed description””." Subsections (3) and (4), which relate to the subsequent amendments as the noble Lord has explained, include the word ““may””. However, if ““may”” is included, ““may not”” would also be included. The phrase that sprang to mind was, ““How wide is the ocean; how deep is the sea?””. I actually think that for once the Merits Committee has not gone far enough; nor, as I said, has the noble Lord.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c332GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Childcare Carers Costs Academic year Employment Jobseeker's allowance Families Interviews Jobcentre Plus Grandparents Low incomes Pay Part-time employment Lone parents Working hours Universal credit Transport Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Self-employed Employment and support allowance Kinship care
Legislation
Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk