Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I am sure that the eloquent and moving speeches we have heard today will cause my noble friend the Minister to think very hard indeed. I accept the need for a change in the name of the benefit. ““Personal independence payment”” is wrong for all the reasons that have been advocated. However, there is a problem. This is a totally new benefit for disabled people, but I believe that having ““allowance”” in its name is a mistake as it is too close to ““disability living allowance””. While listening to the arguments today, I came up with my own preferred formulation—““personal disability costs payment””. It is all of those things, and it is a payment. When my noble friend thinks about these issues—I am sure that he will not give us a plus or minus answer today; at least, I jolly well hope not—I hope that he will consider that suggestion.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 732 c169GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Disability living allowance Benefits rules Costs Autism Medical examinations Payments Social security benefits Welfare tax credits Working tax credit Reform Work capability assessment Personal independence payment Personal budgets
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:50:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784978
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784978
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_784978