Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pannick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill.


Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill

My Lord, I do feel able to withdraw this amendment. I do so in particular because the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, tells the House that reasonable belief, in the circumstances, is a stronger test than balance of probabilities. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 15 withdrawn. Amendments 16 to 22 not moved. Clause 5 : Two year limit for TPIM notices Clause 5 : Two year limit for TPIM notices Amendment 23 not moved. Clause 6 : Prior permission of the court Clause 6 : Prior permission of the court Amendments 24 to 26 not moved. Clause 7 : Urgent cases: reference to the court etc Clause 7 : Urgent cases: reference to the court etc Amendment 27 not moved. Schedule 2 : Urgent cases: reference to the court etc Schedule 2 : Urgent cases: reference to the court etc Amendment 28 not moved. Clause 8 : Directions hearing Clause 8 : Directions hearing Amendment 29 not moved. Amendment 30 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
732 c625 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Deportation Assets Airports Ministerial powers National security Police Powers Parliamentary scrutiny Terrorism Anti-terrorism control orders UK Border Agency Olympic Games 2012 Paralympic Games 2012 Terrorism prevention and investigation measures
Legislation
Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk