Proceeding contribution from Lord Grantchester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 November 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme Regulations 2011.
Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme Regulations 2011
Perhaps I might detain the Committee for one extra moment. Could the noble Baroness consider the question of affordability? While understanding the situation that we are in—especially in the wider European context at the moment—nevertheless, I am concerned that affordability is put up as a criterion that may overrule all other aspects. Could she comment on the relative importance of affordability and say whether her department is moving in any way at all to pick winners and losers? Winners such as PV might provide more affordable success stories than other technologies that might, in terms of their overall rate of return, be worthy of being equally treated. Nevertheless, because of the extra costs involved in their technologies, they are unlikely to be as affordable as others. Can she comment more widely on the affordability criteria in the memorandum?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 732 c404GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Biofuels Housing Finance Heating Pilot schemes Renewable energy Taxation Waste Renewable heat incentive scheme
- Legislation
- Renewable Heat Incentive Scheme Regulations 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:19:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_787089
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_787089
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_787089