Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
I am sorry to interrupt the noble Earl’s flow but I have been extremely restrained today. Can he clarify for me the point that he has just made concerning clinical commissioning groups’ constitutions? As I understand it—he can correct me if I am wrong— they have a considerable amount of freedom on how they frame the obligations in those constitutions. Is the Minister saying that there would be some requirements on them centrally from the board to cover areas such as patient involvement and patient choice?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c66-7
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Health Health services Innovation Private sector Higher education NHS Patients Medical records Medicine Midwives Standards Risk assessment Research National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Maternity services Voluntary organisations Training NHS Commissioning Board Health Education England Health and wellbeing boards Clinical commissioning groups Academic health science networks
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-30 15:18:20 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789240
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789240
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789240