Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
I am really puzzled by that. What happens in a big swathe of the country if Monitor or the national Commissioning Board considers that there is a 100 per cent public sector monopoly that is actually slowing down the improvement in services? Does that mean that they cannot, as a matter of policy in order to benefit patients, break that 100 per cent monopoly in a certain part of the country that is public and bring in, say, the East Surrey nurses or whoever as a social enterprise to reduce that 100 per cent to, say, 95 per cent? That would change the proportion of services in a chunk of the country, and that is what I understand competition to mean.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c107
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Health Health services Innovation Private sector Higher education NHS Patients Medical records Medicine Midwives Standards Risk assessment Research National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Maternity services Voluntary organisations Training NHS Commissioning Board Health Education England Health and wellbeing boards Clinical commissioning groups Academic health science networks
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-30 15:18:27 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789290
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789290
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789290