Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Health and Social Care Bill.
Health and Social Care Bill
My point is that either for the board or Monitor to act with a specific view to change the market share for its own sake would run counter to these provisions. However, that does not mean that the market share of the NHS, the independent sector or the voluntary sector could not change. It depends entirely on what is seen to be in the interest of patients. In a particular area of the country, one might find that there was a considerable case for increasing the share of social enterprises in order to meet the needs of patients. That would not be illegal. What would be illegal would be the board setting out with the express intention of expanding a particular sector for the sake of it. That is the distinction here.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c107
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Health Health services Innovation Private sector Higher education NHS Patients Medical records Medicine Midwives Standards Risk assessment Research National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Maternity services Voluntary organisations Training NHS Commissioning Board Health Education England Health and wellbeing boards Clinical commissioning groups Academic health science networks
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-30 15:18:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789293
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789293
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_789293