Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, I hear what my noble friend says, but the fact is that the amendments he refers to would reduce Monitor’s independence from political interference. We are clear that we do not want political interference in Monitor’s activities. The intent of the amendment is clearly to give the Secretary of State increased accountability for the decisions around Monitor's functions. We believe that Monitor will be an effective regulator and able to deal with conflicts of interest. Clause 63 requires Monitor to resolve conflicts between its functions. If a failure to resolve conflicts between functions was significant, then the Secretary of State already has the power to intervene under Clause 67. Therefore, there is an intervention mechanism but we suggest that it should only be triggered in the circumstances to which I have referred.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1176-7 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Children Compensation Accountability Disadvantaged Competition Health Health services Fees and charges Licensing Education Human rights EU law Insolvency Innovation Homelessness Home care services Private sector NHS Older people Procurement Mergers Negligence NHS foundation trusts Standards Special educational needs Training Regulation Reform Social services Monitor Treatment centres Sexual and reproductive health NHS Commissioning Board Healthwatch England Cooperation and Competition Panel
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk