Proceeding contribution from Baroness Meacher (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I thank the Minister very much for his response. Certainly, the idea was that this amendment should be cost-neutral and a redistribution between the support group benefits and this benefit. There will obviously be significant losers in this; child carers will certainly be among them. I do not envisage local authorities picking up the tab in the years ahead. There are very real concerns but, at this time of night, I must accept the Minister’s response and withdraw the amendment. Amendment 21A withdrawn. Clause 13 : Work-related requirements: introductory Clause 13 : Work-related requirements: introductory Amendment 22 not moved. Clause 15 : Work-focused interview requirement Amendment 23 Clause 15 : Work-focused interview requirement Amendment 23 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c1368
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Childcare Benefits rules Carers Cancer Criminal injuries compensation Housing benefit Domestic abuse Exemptions Interviews Landlords Medical treatments Payments Private rented housing Social security benefits Working hours Social rented housing Self-employed Consumer prices index Housing occupancy Shared housing Employment and support allowance Universal credit Severe disability premium
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:30:46 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795508
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795508
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795508