Proceeding contribution from Lord Scott of Foscote (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
I was not suggesting that ““shall”” should apply to all the items. I was suggesting that it should apply to Clause 40(2)(d)—““may”” could be kept for the rest.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c379GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Devolved matters Detainees Electronic surveillance Emergency powers Legislation Powers of entry Personal records Northern Ireland Nuisance Noise Scotland Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Wales Telephone tapping
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:17:46 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795631
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795631
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795631