Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
I am grateful to my noble friend for that explanation. I could not accept his code of conduct, but he will see what we have set out in Clauses 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 and even down to Clause 53 which sets out a corresponding code in relation to Welsh devolved powers of entry. It might be that my noble friend wants to have further discussions about that. However, what we have set out in terms of being able to alter or replace the code should be sufficiently wide and able to deal with difficult matters such as a code of conduct in relation either to animals or to other matters. On glancing through my noble friend’s code, I thought that it was what might be described as over-prescriptive. It is better to leave it to the route that we are setting out in the Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c380-1GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Devolved matters Detainees Electronic surveillance Emergency powers Legislation Powers of entry Personal records Northern Ireland Nuisance Noise Scotland Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Wales Telephone tapping
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:17:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795636
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795636
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795636