Proceeding contribution from Lord Armstrong of Ilminster (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
143: Clause 58, page 41, line 34, after ““place,”” insert— ““(iii) at any time when Parliament is sitting or is in recess the Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, considers it would be inexpedient to introduce primary legislation to authorise a temporary extension of detention because of— (a) time constraints, (b) the risk of prejudicing the possibility of a fair trial of a person suspected of or charged with a terrorist offence, or (c) unacceptable risk to public safety or to security,””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c384GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Devolved matters Detainees Electronic surveillance Emergency powers Legislation Powers of entry Personal records Northern Ireland Nuisance Noise Scotland Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Wales Telephone tapping
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:17:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795650
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795650
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795650