Proceeding contribution from Duncan Hames (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 20 December 2011. It occurred during Backbench debate on Communities and Local Government.
Communities and Local Government
May I wish you, Madam Deputy Speaker, and all the staff of the Houses of Parliament a very merry Christmas? I speak today in support of increased local decision-making in the planning system. Specifically, I would like to encourage the Government to ensure that the neighbourhood plans made possible by the Localism Act 2011 give local people enough power to have a real say over what development takes place in their area, where it takes place and, crucially, whether it meets the sustainable development test. There are many cases in my constituency that illustrate not only the ways in which people currently feel disengaged from the planning system, but the great potential in communities when they get organised. A great number of my constituents have contacted me about large housing developments proposed near Birds Marsh woods and the Avon floodplain in Chippenham. They have emphasised the importance of preserving the countryside around the edge of the town, and many have expressed their frustration at their apparent inability to affect the decisions being made. One lady made the point that,"““the voice of ordinary residents does not seem to be heard, and decisions are made by people for whom this is not their home””." Similarly, the expansion of an edge-of-town Sainsbury's superstore has recently been approved by the council, leading to the resignation in dismay of the chair of the Chippenham Vision group. Earlier this month, I asked the Minister with responsibility for decentralisation what advice he would give to councils that face such developer interest in out-of-town sites. He assured me that the ““town centre first”” policy remains firm, but that development in Chippenham would suggest otherwise, as Wiltshire council felt free to ignore it. There will be no public confidence in a "take it or leave it" attitude to planning policy, with some councils proceeding with development that is neither sustainable nor what local people want, for fear of paying for expensive appeals by developers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 537 c1252-3
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Community development Capital investment Housing Fire prevention Homelessness Local government finance Planning Merseyside Reform Sustainable development Urban areas Regeneration Supporting people programme Department for Communities and Local Government Affordable housing
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:54:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796863
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796863
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_796863