Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hollis of Heigham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
I am sure that the noble Lord, Lord Freud, does not wish to appear to be subverting the view of the entire House, which was expressed in the full knowledge that the amendment which we voted on was devised—I devised it—as a paving amendment to a substantive one, so that we could debate it in good time. Most of the population of the House has gone home, believing in good faith that the previous vote has established the principle—as it has. However, the noble Lord is trying to renege on that by forcing a vote despite the late-night keeping of the roster. That would be quite improper and quite unprecedented, and I strongly suggest that he think again.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 734 c204
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Children Disability living allowance Disadvantaged Costs Cancer Community care grants Employment Jobseeker's allowance Health Finance Local government Low incomes Public expenditure Loans Social security benefits Social Fund Young people Students UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Crisis loans Employment and support allowance Departmental expenditure limits Work capability assessment Annually managed expenditure
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:10:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_799260
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_799260
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_799260