Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 January 2012. It occurred during Backbench debate on Pub Companies.


Pub Companies

No, I want to make some progress. [Hon. Members: ““Oh!””] I will give way to the hon. Gentleman in a bit, because in two-and-a-half-hours' evidence to the Select Committee he quizzed me for an hour, so let us be clear that I have answered an awful lot of questions from him. Why did we not legislate? Some in this Chamber wanted the Government to step in and regulate, and some even believe that we promised to do so, but we promised to take action, and that is what we have done. We have had to consider all the evidence and the action that we would take, and I believe that the action we have taken is appropriate and effective. We did not legislate because, first, we wanted to act now, not in two or three years' time. To legislate, we would have had to carry out a lengthy process of consultation, of drafting and of pre-legislative scrutiny, and after that we would have had to fight for a slot in the legislative Sessions. It is highly unlikely that such a slot could have been found quickly. Secondly, this is a deregulatory Government. Additional regulation should always be a measure of last resort. For the Government to intervene in the commercial contractual relationships between two parties, they must have very good reason. That is in line with the Government's top priority of achieving strong, sustainable and balanced growth, and generating a climate that supports enterprise and creates jobs. Thirdly, the Office of Fair Trading found in October 2010 that there were no competition issues affecting consumers in this market. That is a critical point, but I am afraid that the Select Committee report did not discuss it. I am aware that in some circles, it is believed that the OFT is wrong. That is not a view that I share. As Minister with responsibility for competition, I have high confidence in the rigour and accuracy of the OFT. Without evidence of competition issues, the rationale for Government intervention is significantly reduced. That is in contrast to the situation in the groceries market, where the Competition Commission found evidence of competition issues. The Government have therefore committed to introducing a groceries code adjudicator as soon as parliamentary time allows to ensure that large retailers treat their suppliers fairly and lawfully.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
538 c396-7 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Codes of practice Alcoholic drinks Companies Competition Public houses Tenants Tied housing
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk