Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jason McCartney (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Northern Rail Hub.


Northern Rail Hub

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. In our part of West Yorkshire, Grand Central has increased its range of services and is stopping in Mirfield just outside Huddersfield. Direct rail services, particularly to London and the south, are an important part of breaking down the north-south divide, and I certainly welcome those developments. I thank the Minister for being here today. I should like to note a few things that I welcome in her speech to the Northern Rail conference in Leeds in October last year. In that speech, she recognised the role that the railway has to play in bringing prosperity to the north, with which all of us in this Chamber would agree. I also welcome her acknowledgement that the Chancellor has prioritised investment in rail by announcing in the spending review £18 billion of funding for rail. I agree with her comments that rail can deliver not only growth, but a more balanced sustainable economic growth and that it can help to tackle the prosperity gap between the north and south. Crucially, the Minister stated that the Government recognised the benefits that the remainder of the northern hub programme could offer and confirmed that they would be looking ““very seriously”” at the whole proposal in the run up to this July's high-level output specification 2 statement. Again, I welcome that. I should like to put the Minister on the spot, however, and ask her three specific questions. First, will she commit to ensuring that the northern hub project is fully funded, so that the north can enjoy the economic benefits that that would deliver: 20,000 to 30,000 new jobs and £4.2 billion of wider economic benefits? Secondly, given that the Government have rightly funded HS2, which enjoys a benefit-cost ratio of 1.6:1 and that the northern hub enjoys a business case of more than 4:1, does she agree that it makes economic sense to fund the hub fully?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
538 c299WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Capital investment Infrastructure Greater Manchester Leeds Railways Railway network Liverpool Sheffield South Yorkshire North Yorkshire North East Lancashire West Yorkshire North West
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk