Proceeding contribution from Julie Hilling (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 January 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Northern Rail Hub.
Northern Rail Hub
I am slightly puzzled. The argument is that the whole of the hub gives the 4:1 benefit ratio. There is a possibility, of course, that one little place may give less benefit than another bit, but all together the benefit ratio is 4:1. Given what the Minister is saying, is there a risk that a part that has a lower cost-value ratio but still a value will be overlooked?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 538 c317WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Capital investment Infrastructure Greater Manchester Leeds Railways Railway network Liverpool Sheffield South Yorkshire North Yorkshire North East Lancashire West Yorkshire North West
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:39:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801888
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801888
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_801888