Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Willetts (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 January 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Postgraduate Education.


Postgraduate Education

The total amount to pay back is determined by the cost of the higher education, and it keeps the connection with the university. That is where I part company with the graduate tax. The point that I am trying to make is that graduates will experience only a slightly higher deduction from their pay packet by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, and if their income ever falls to less than £21,000, no payments whatever will be made. That matters to the debate about postgraduate education. I am not simply trying to reopen the debate on our undergraduate proposals. The idea seems to be that it will be harder for postgraduates to finance themselves, because they will suddenly have an enormous amount of debt. In all the conversations that we have had with lenders about, for example, graduates' ability to access a mortgage, they have said that what lenders look at is fixed monthly repayments. We have increased the threshold for repayments from £15,000 to £21,000, so the monthly repayments under our system have fallen compared with the system that we inherited from Labour. That matters to postgraduates' ability to fund themselves. That is the source of Opposition Members' anxiety: a misunderstanding of the implications of the reforms. Nevertheless, I accept that there is concern about postgraduate issues. We recognise the need to monitor closely what is happening, investigate if problems arise and be absolutely clear what they are and what will need to be done about them. Today, we published the letter that we sent to the Higher Education Funding Council for England with the grant statement for the coming year. A paragraph in that letter specifically discusses postgraduates:"““We are pleased that the Council is taking the lead on gathering evidence to improve our understanding of the purpose and characteristics of, and outcomes from, postgraduate study, with the intention of reviewing postgraduate participation following the changes to undergraduate funding.””" We accept that it must be monitored."““We also note the progress the Council is making, with its HE Public Information Steering Group””" on better information for postgraduate students. Also, of course, we refer to continuing"““work on strategically important and vulnerable subjects””."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
539 c123WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Debts Finance Higher education Universities Reform Research Students Science Postgraduate education British students abroad
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk