Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2012. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.


Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

I am sure that my noble friend would agree, however, that protective costs orders are matters of discretion for the judge who hears an application, and that the threshold is extremely high. In his particular case, he obviously advanced matters of considerable public interest that were much wider than only the issues in the litigation that affected his clients. So a protective costs order can be applied for in such cases. However, I was involved in the case following the flooding of houses at Aberfan that occurred as the result of the spoil banks placed there after the disaster. In that sort of case, where individual householders were affected, protective costs orders would not have met that threshold.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c1578 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Charities Asbestos Legal profession Employment Finance Legal aid scheme Liability Environment protection Environment Insurance Legal costs Learning disability Industrial diseases Personal injury Prisoners Marketing Police cautions Negligence Mesothelioma Rehabilitation Sentencing Voluntary organisations Young offenders Regulation Trade unions Victims Aarhus Convention Community orders Third party financing
Legislation
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk