Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 February 2012. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.


Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

I am grateful to my noble friend for saying there will be synchronisation. The scales of justice have been tipped against defendants by this fourfold cost that they have been calling for over a period of time. The purpose of this Bill is to even the scales of justice up. If there is any period between shifting from that side to this side the success fee and the ATE insurance without providing one-way costs as the balance, the scales will go completely in the opposite direction, and it is the suffering claimants who will come out the worst in a situation like that. I cannot resist coming back to the question of protective costs orders, having heard my noble friend Lord Lester. Protective costs orders are applied for in public interest cases. I am not concerned simply with public interest cases. These could be the private individual, the householder whose house is flooded, in the example that I gave—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
734 c1585 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Charities Asbestos Legal profession Employment Finance Legal aid scheme Liability Environment protection Environment Insurance Legal costs Learning disability Industrial diseases Personal injury Prisoners Marketing Police cautions Negligence Mesothelioma Rehabilitation Sentencing Voluntary organisations Young offenders Regulation Trade unions Victims Aarhus Convention Community orders Third party financing
Legislation
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk