Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 8 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill.


Health and Social Care Bill

My Lords, in rising briefly to support the amendment so ably proposed by my noble friend Lord Patel and supported by the noble Lord, Lord Alderdice, I ask the Minister one very simple question. In Clause 1(1)(a) the Bill talks about the, "““physical and mental health of the people of England””," and says that the health service must be ““designed to secure improvement”” in that health. What on earth could the objection possibly be to inserting in paragraph (b) at line 6 the unexceptional words listed in the amendment? They simply stress the crucial importance of mental as well as physical illness. How on earth could this be construed as doing any damage whatever to the Bill? It is something that I hope very much the Government can be persuaded to accept.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c267 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Equality Health services Finance Education Expenditure Health professions Higher education NHS Patients Ministerial responsibility Management Mental health services National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Standards Universities Training Reform Research Social services Prostate cancer Postgraduate education NHS Commissioning Board National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Education England
Legislation
Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk