Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 10 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords Reform Bill [HL].


House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Clause 18 was not in the original Bill; it was added in an amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, in Committee. I have to confess that we did not have a long debate on it but he was very reasonable in moving the amendment and perhaps I was too reasonable in accepting it at the time. However, the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, makes a fair point. Perhaps we should stop for a second and consider what was referred to earlier as the ““monster Bill””—not a phrase that I would dream of using. When that Bill comes forward, it will propose that this should be an elected House. Are we going to say that Members of the other place should not take part in those elections? Therefore, it gives rise to an interesting question. I think that the noble and learned Baroness is correct: it would perhaps be wiser to accept the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Trefgarne, take the clause out now and keep the Bill as simple and as short as possible when it goes to the other place. Amendment 300 agreed. Clause 19 : Commencement Clause 19 : Commencement Amendments 301 to 304 not moved. Amendment 305 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c538-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal records Allowances House of Lords House of Commons Eligibility Disqualification Hereditary peers House of Lords composition Leave House of Lords Appointments Commission Members Peers Life peers Reform Voting rights
Legislation
House of Lords Reform Bill (HL) 2010-12
House of Lords (Amendment) Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk