Proceeding contribution from Oliver Heald (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 February 2012. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pensions and Social Security.
Pensions and Social Security
Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that we need to exercise judgment about what the increase should be? One of the faults of the last Government was to be too rigid. My hon. Friend the Member for Meon Valley (George Hollingbery) has already mentioned the 75p increase, but there was also the freezing of the additional pension, which, again, was considered a mean act. Is it not right for the Government to take a judgment and—on pension credit, for example—to make increases well above the rate that they have to use, which is earnings, and instead use a higher measure, in order to be fair?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 540 c1048
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Benefits rules Index linking Workplace pensions Pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Reform Uprating
- Legislation
- Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012
- Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012
- Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2012
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:53:28 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811596
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811596
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811596