Proceeding contribution from Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 February 2012. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pensions and Social Security.
Pensions and Social Security
But if the right hon. Gentleman thought that in the event of prices being higher than earnings he would choose prices, why did he make it the statutory position that just earnings would be used, therefore pencilling in an earnings-only increase for 2012, which meant that we had to find extra money to do better than just earnings this year?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 540 c1049
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Benefits rules Index linking Workplace pensions Pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Reform Uprating
- Legislation
- Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012
- Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012
- Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2012
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:54:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811600
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811600
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811600