Proceeding contribution from Sarah Newton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 February 2012. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pensions and Social Security.
Pensions and Social Security
I acknowledge the right hon. Gentleman's deep knowledge of this subject, but he is not giving the House an entirely accurate picture. For the longest period, the state pension was linked to average earnings, but it suits his argument today to make a comparison with RPI. The huge benefit of the triple lock is that it provides a choice. Average earnings could be taken into account, for example, and if they grew between 6% and 7%, so would pensions. Also, there is always the floor of 2.5%, which would prevent a repeat of the disgrace of giving pensioners 75p, as happened under the last Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 540 c1050-1
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Benefits rules Index linking Workplace pensions Pensions Social security benefits State retirement pensions Reform Uprating
- Legislation
- Social Security Benefits Up-rating Order 2012
- Guaranteed Minimum Pensions Increase Order 2012
- Pensions Act 2008 (Abolition of Protected Rights) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) (Amendment) Order 2012
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:54:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811606
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811606
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_811606