Proceeding contribution from Tim Loughton (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 March 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Services for Young People.
Services for Young People
At the risk of holding a third-party debate through the Chair of the Select Committee, may I say that the hon. Member for Westminster North (Ms Buck) makes an interesting point? In the borough next to her own, Hammersmith and Fulham has pooled budgets between the youth service and the youth justice system, and there is a clear imperative to incentivise local youth services to work with legal services, to keep young people out of youth offender institutions and the youth justice system. If we are to hold local authorities to account for doing good stuff, positive stuff, proactive stuff and preventive stuff with young people, we want to penalise them if they do not do so—the result is that children end up in young offenders institutions—but reward them when they keep young people away from offending behaviour.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 542 c267WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Finance Training Young people Voluntary work Youth services Cuts National Citizen Service Trust
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:45:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820659
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820659
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_820659