Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Paul Flynn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 April 2012. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Looped Blind Cords.


Looped Blind Cords

I am grateful to the Minister for his reasonable response on this issue. We all know from past experience that industry is reluctant to change. Usually that is for good reason. If a company has to retool, that means expense and problems that it would normally seek to avoid. Perhaps we could give the industry some incentive. For example, companies could become more profitable if they were selling cords that were guaranteed to be safer than the ones from the past. Perhaps the Government could give them some encouragement in that regard so that we can have blinds marketed that avoid the use of a loop and that are inherently much safer.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c76-7WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Children Death Regulation Safety Trading standards Window blinds
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk