Parliamentary Search

Debate on bill and Debate on select committee report on Monday, 17 July 2006, in the House of Lords, led by Lord McKenzie of Luton. The answering member was Baroness Noakes.

Finance (No 2) Bill

Finance (No 2) Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Committee negatived. Standing Order 47 having been dispensed with Lords third reading (formal). Passed. (Debated with report of Economic Affairs Committee on Finance Bill 2006 (HL 204 2005-06))

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
684 c1041-94 
Session
2005-06
Department
Treasury
Economic Affairs Committee
Legislative stage
Third reading
Second reading
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Related items
Finance Bill (EAC Report)
Monday, 17 July 2006
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Burnett | 684 c1051-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is a great honour for me to make my maiden speech today. I should first like to put on ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 684 c1041-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that this Bill be now read a second time. In addition to covering the substa...
Show all contributions (30)
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 684 c1091-4 (Link to this contribution) No, my Lords, I am not saying that. AIM has been successful. We are saying that, for real estate inv...
Baroness Noakes | 684 c1091 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, is the Minister saying that small investors should not invest via AIM at all? Is that the ...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 684 c1088-91 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank all who have spoken in today’s debate. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Burnett...
Lord Howard of Rising | 684 c1084-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Burnett, on his very good and entertaining maiden spee...
Lord Newby | 684 c1081-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this has been the most extraordinarily wide-ranging debate. We have had a very erudite dis...
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 684 c1081 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it was not intended as an insult. I have the highest regard for the Chancellor; I have kno...
Lord Haskel | 684 c1081 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that is rather a cheap insult, if I may say so.
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 684 c1078-81 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Lord. I apologise. I had a guest and I had to leave the Ch...
Lord Barnett | 684 c1078 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, unfortunately the noble Lord was not in his place when I answered his point about the 500 ...
Lord Sheldon | 684 c1062-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sorry if I did not hear the noble Baroness correctly, but that is what I thought I he...
Baroness Noakes | 684 c1061 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I must have expressed myself badly because I have been misheard twice by the Benches oppos...
Lord Haskel | 684 c1067-70 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I shall speak about the Finance Bill less from the point of view of tax or economic affair...
Lord Northbrook | 684 c1063-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we are once again here on a hot July day to discuss the Finance Bill and the report on it ...
Lord Rosser | 684 c1074-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will not go down the road travelled by the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, in commenting on...
Viscount Trenchard | 684 c1070-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, thank the Minister for giving us this opportunity to debate the Finance Bill today...
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 684 c1077-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thought that sentiments of the kind expressed by the noble Lord had died out long ago wi...
Lord Marlesford | 684 c1059-61 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, some people have top rate plus 1 per cent, but many still have an ultimate top rate of 40 ...
Lord Sheldon | 684 c1061 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, in any discussion of the economic situation, an attack on the Chancellor of the Exchequer ...
Lord Monson | 684 c1061 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, would the noble Lord not agree that the party to which he belongs did nothing whatever to ...
Lord Barnett | 684 c1054-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am delighted to have the opportunity of congratulating the noble Lord on his excellent m...
Baroness Noakes | 684 c1049-51 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the debate and I look forward to hearing the maiden s...
Lord Wakeham | 684 c1045-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not sure what is happening in the test match but in this debate, for the second year ...
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 684 c1059 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, surely my noble friend is wrong in saying that the Chancellor has stopped at a top rate of...
Lord Marlesford | 684 c1057-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I cannot resist making a comment on the maiden speech of the noble Lord, Lord Burnett. I s...
Lord Barnett | 684 c1057 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I was surprised and delighted with how brief the noble Baroness was in her opening remarks...
Baroness Noakes | 684 c1056 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I did not say it was a failing economy. I made it plain that I did not say that.
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 684 c1042-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not have those data to hand. But, as I can, the noble Lord can look up the record and...
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 684 c1042 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I apologise for interrupting the Minister but could he tell the House what percentage of t...
Subjects
Disability Computers Fraud Income tax Film Inheritance tax Economic situation National insurance contributions Shares Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Research Trusts Real estate investment trusts
Legislation
Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk