Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Monday, 9 June 2008, in the House of Lords.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
National Insurance Contributions Bill. Lords Committee stage. Clauses 1 to 7 agreed to. Schedules 1 and 2 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 702 c111-32GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Department
- Treasury
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
-
National Insurance Contributions Bill. Brought from the Commons. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 28-EN also published.
Monday, 4 February 2008
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c119-22GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 5: 5: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause— ““Consequences of basic...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c132GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister has reminded me of another matter—that the Treasury kept very quiet about the impact wh...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c125GC (Link to this contribution) That is very helpful. I will make sure that my colleagues in another place realise that. This mornin...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c115GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister tempts me. We could prolong the argument, so perhaps I may suggest that we move on.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c115GC (Link to this contribution) I thank noble Lords who have spoken to this amendment, which gives us a chance to catch up on where ...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c118GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord, Lord Newby, for his support. Like him, I rejoice that this is not a tax for ...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c111-4GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out ““““which”” to the end”” and insert ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I was referring to the affirmative procedure proposed in the Bill. The committee has not commented i...
-
Lord Newby | 702 c122GC (Link to this contribution) I have some sympathy with what the noble Baroness is seeking to achieve. Although in many ways the a...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c131-2GC (Link to this contribution) I reject absolutely challenges of dishonesty around this matter. The Government have been very clear...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c128-30GC (Link to this contribution) The characterisation of Clause 3 as a stealth tax and as cherry-picking is completely wrong. I can u...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) There still is not because the Government have not yet tabled amendments in the other place to effec...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c125GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness. I want to make clear that the amendments we referred to earlier...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c115-8GC (Link to this contribution) I am happy to do that. I was simply placing our position on the record, as other noble Lords have st...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c119GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness is right: I did not specifically deal with that point and I should have done. The...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Before I respond, can the Minister explain his comments about the Delegated Powers Committee? The am...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c125GC (Link to this contribution) That is correct. But the Minister will recognise that it is a quite extraordinary departure from the...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c125-8GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak on Clause 3 stand part because it is an entirely disreputable clause. I entered the Go...
-
Baroness Fookes | 702 c111GC (Link to this contribution) I remind the Grand Committee that if there is a Division in the House, the Committee must be adjourn...
-
Lord Newby | 702 c114-5GC (Link to this contribution) There are a number of anomalies and ironies about this issue and the fact that we are discussing it....
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Is the noble Baroness saying that there was no opportunity to debate that in the other place?
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that reply and the noble Lord, Lord Newby, for his comments. I agree that t...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c119GC (Link to this contribution) I accept that they would arise wherever we did the roundings. But the affirmative resolution procedu...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c122-4GC (Link to this contribution) I say to the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that I am astounded at his cynicism about how the Treasury migh...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c130GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Baroness will forgive me, it depends on how you do your allocations. I can see that she...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c130-1GC (Link to this contribution) I think we could just say that it was not intended by the Treasury that they should not gain, as tha...
-
Baroness Noakes | 702 c130GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that wholly predictable response. It brings home to me that what the Treasu...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 702 c124GC (Link to this contribution) But, whatever process is adopted, it will be before the other House before the legislation is determ...
- Subjects
- Income tax Index linking National insurance Pay Pensions National insurance contributions Tax rates and bands Uprating Earnings limits
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (28)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 19:20:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_70911
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_70911
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_70911