Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 9 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

I thank the Minister for that reply and the noble Lord, Lord Newby, for his comments. I agree that this is a relatively weak amendment because it allows the Treasury to table the kind of meaningless content that we see from time to time—for example, in relation to Written Answers—and which has become an art form in certain departments. Indeed, it would give the Treasury another opportunity to assert that it was right, although I suspect it could not assert that it is a long-term decision because such decisions rarely are. The noble Lord, Lord Newby, made me realise that this is not the right amendment; the earlier amendments are the right ones because they put the proper parliamentary process in place regarding changes. The amendment does not deal with the issue of the Government separately pushing the personal allowance out of alignment. The Minister said that it would be in the Pre-Budget Report and in the Budget and there would be lots of opportunity to discuss it. However, what happened in the week before Crewe was neither in the Pre-Budget Report nor the Budget; it was conjured up at the last minute to buy the Government out of the huge trouble they were in and foresaw for the following week.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c124GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Income tax Index linking National insurance Pay Pensions National insurance contributions Tax rates and bands Uprating Earnings limits
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk