Parliamentary Search

Debate on bill on Tuesday, 14 December 2010, in the House of Commons.

Superannuation Bill

Superannuation Bill. Programme motion relating to consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed on question. Consideration of Lords amendments. Commons amendment to Lords amendment 6 debated and negatived on division (225 votes to 313). Lords amendments 1 to 7 agreed to.

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
520 c837-58 
Session
2010-12
Department
Cabinet Office
Legislative stage
Lords amendments
Procedure
Programme motions
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Related items
Proceeding contributions
Liam Byrne | 520 c840-1 (Link to this contribution) May I start by expressing my gratitude to the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General ...
John Hemming | 520 c841-2 (Link to this contribution) It is rather sad that, again, there are relatively few people in the Gallery when we are debating su...
Show all contributions (33)
John McDonnell | 520 c842-3 (Link to this contribution) Lords amendment 1 requires the Government to consult with the aim of seeking agreement, and provides...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c843 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman refers to a report of that meeting, but I can give him another account, because I...
John McDonnell | 520 c843-6 (Link to this contribution) My understanding is that on 11 October, PCS and POA tried to explore with the Minister opportunities...
Lord Dodds of Duncairn | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution) I have listened to the debate with great interest, particularly on the consultation with the POA, PC...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution) The right hon. Gentleman raises a good point, which is that it is by no means true that all civil se...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c838-40 (Link to this contribution) When I opened the debate on Second Reading in September, I set out—at some length, I regret to say—t...
Speaker | 520 c838 (Link to this contribution) With this we may take Lords amendments 2, 3 and 7.
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c838 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.
John McDonnell | 520 c854 (Link to this contribution) Could we clarify what the Minister has just said? Is the provision he supports simply a device to be...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c854 (Link to this contribution) I shall be clear: both sides of the House have accepted that the current scheme is unsustainable and...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c853-4 (Link to this contribution) The right hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne) asked why we needed to keep the caps at ...
Liam Byrne | 520 c852-3 (Link to this contribution) I want to speak briefly about Lords amendments 4, 5 and 6, as well as amendment (a), tabled by my ho...
Speaker | 520 c851 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman will be able to move his amendment formally later.
John McDonnell | 520 c851 (Link to this contribution) The House needs to be aware of what this measure actually means, and I make it clear that I will pre...
John Hemming | 520 c852 (Link to this contribution) As someone who interests himself in procedural issues, perhaps I could think of the clause as being ...
John McDonnell | 520 c851-2 (Link to this contribution) Thank you very much for that advice, Mr Deputy Speaker. I get confused when we are talking about sun...
Speaker | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution) All the Lords amendments engage the financial privilege of the House. If they are agreed to, the app...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c850 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 4.
Speaker | 520 c850 (Link to this contribution) With this we may take Lords amendments 5 and 6 and amendment (a) thereto.
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c850-1 (Link to this contribution) The amendments respond to concerns raised by Opposition Members on Second Reading in the other place...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution) Those are not concerns that have just arisen; they have been there throughout. I have been forthrigh...
John McDonnell | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. Let me quote to him his statement to the House on 30 O...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman talks as if this were a trifling consideration, but it is not. This process has b...
John McDonnell | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution) If that is the right hon. Gentleman's only concern and his only objection to the position of PCS, su...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c848-9 (Link to this contribution) I have to take issue with the hon. Gentleman's phrase about the process just beginning to become pro...
John McDonnell | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution) Following on from an earlier point, the Minister will know better than most of us that these negotia...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution) It is really hard to do that, because, as I pointed out in the letter that I sent to all Members, th...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution) The concern raised by the unions at the time was that there was insufficient compensation in the sch...
Michael McCann | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution) Two pieces of information have come out on this. First, we received a Cabinet Office circular from t...
John McDonnell | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution) I am sure that the right hon. Gentleman would not want inadvertently to mislead the House. Just for ...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c846 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne), who spoke from the Opp...
Subjects
Conditions of employment Compensation Civil service Employment Industrial relations Workplace pensions Redundancy pay Public consultation Redundancy Trade unions Public and Commercial Services Union
Legislation
Superannuation Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk