Skip to main content

Written question asked by Wendy Morton (Conservative) on Wednesday, 15 July 2026, in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 1 September 2026. It was answered by Emma Hardy (Labour) on Tuesday, 1 September 2026 on behalf of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.


Packaging: Recycling

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging scheme on businesses in (a) reducing the level of unnecessary packaging, (b) increasing the level of recyclable materials and (c) increasing the redesign of products to improve the recyclability; and if she will set out the evidence used to make those assessments.

Answer

The Government assessed Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging (pEPR) through the 2024 impact assessment. pEPR incentivises businesses to reduce unnecessary packaging, increase recyclable materials and improve packaging design by making producers responsible for household packaging waste management costs. From 2026, fees will be modulated using PackUK’s Recyclability Assessment Methodology, with less recyclable packaging attracting higher fees and more recyclable packaging attracting lower fees. Evidence includes the impact assessment, producer-reported data, local authority cost modelling, and extensive consultation and engagement. PackUK’s forthcoming five-year strategy will detail how environmental benefits, including packaging reduction and recycling quality and quantity, will be tracked.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
19025
Session
2026-27
Subjects
Recycling Packaging Standards
Link
View this Written question on www.parliament.uk