Written question asked by Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative) on Tuesday, 28 January 2025, in the House of Lords. It was due for an answer on Tuesday, 11 February 2025. It was answered by Baroness Twycross (Labour) on Monday, 10 February 2025 on behalf of the Cabinet Office.
Parliamentary Scrutiny
- Question
-
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Lord Hanson of Flint on 22 January (HLWS374), what plans they have to encourage other Departments to emulate the Home Office in (1) undertaking detailed post-legislative scrutiny of Acts, (2) engaging with key government and operational stakeholders, and (3) in making written statements when memoranda are produced and laid as Command Papers.
- Answer
-
The Cabinet Office has written to departments reminding them of the importance of post-legislative scrutiny.
It is a matter for each department to determine whether a written statement should accompany publication, and which stakeholders to engage when conducting post-legislative scrutiny.
While all bills that have reached Royal Assent are eligible for post-legislative scrutiny, it can be agreed between the department and the relevant Commons departmental select committee that a memorandum is not required.
Secondary information
- Type
- Written question
- Reference
- HL4505
- Session
- 2024-26
- Related items
-
Post Legislative Scrutiny of the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019
Wednesday, 22 January 2025
Written statements
House of Lords
- Subjects
- Home Office Parliamentary scrutiny
- Link
- View this Written question on www.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-09-05 19:42:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL4505
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL4505
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/writtenparliamentaryquestion/lords/2024-25/HL4505