Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from George Osborne (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 5 July 2012. It occurred during Debate on Professional Standards in the Banking Industry.


Professional Standards in the Banking Industry

I will give way in a moment, when I have made my arguments about the public inquiry.

Secondly, judge-led public inquiries take an incredibly long time to conclude. I shall set out my evidence. In the motion, the Opposition want an inquiry established under the Inquiries Act 2005. There have been 14 inquiries under that Act, seven of which are still ongoing or have not been published because of criminal proceedings—remember, as we hear, there could be criminal proceedings in this case—and one of which was set up seven years ago and still has not been published.

The shortest inquiry established at the outset under the Act—into the tragic loss of life following the explosion at the ICL Plastics factory in Glasgow—took one year and five months. No other inquiry established from the outset under the Act has taken less than two years. Frankly, the idea that a widespread judge-led public inquiry into the culture and professional standards in Britain’s largest industry would take place much quicker than a public inquiry into an explosion at a plastics factory in Glasgow is fanciful. It leads me to believe that the Labour party wants to put off the moment when we actually investigate what happened.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
547 c1134 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Banks Bank of England Barclays Financial Services Authority Interest rates Financial markets Regulation Treasury LIBOR
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk