Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 27 October 2014. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Recall of MPs Bill.


Recall of MPs Bill

If the hon. Gentleman does not mind, I will deal with these points first.

On the concern about costs, the Deputy Leader of the House, the right hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake), said that under the amendment there would be no cost controls at all on the first part of the recall process, the notice of intent. As he wrapped up Tuesday’s debate, he said that it would effectively be a free-for-all. I know he has read the amendments, so I am surprised he said that, because there are controls that mirror exactly those for the petition stage in the Government’s own Bill. Irrespective of that, it is perfectly possible to build in further controls—strict limits on expenditure and so on—and I have indicated to the Opposition and colleagues in my own party that if they table amendments on Report to bolster those cost controls, I would be very happy to support them.

The second issue, which relates to thresholds, is also technical. The principal concern involves the notice of intent to recall, the fear being that it would be too easy to secure 3,500 signatures—or 5%—in one month and that there would therefore be too many recall petitions.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
587 c60 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Conduct By-elections Misconduct Members Recall petitions
Legislation
Recall of MPs Bill 2014-15
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk