Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Crispin Blunt (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 July 2016. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Report of the Iraq Inquiry.


Report of the Iraq Inquiry

The Foreign Affairs Committee has stayed its inquiry into our intervention in Libya in order to take into account the conclusions of the Iraq inquiry. Given that it could be claimed that the inquiry’s central conclusions apply to some degree or other to Libya—not least as stabilisation planning for Libya was described by my right hon. Friend the Member for Rutland and Melton (Sir Alan Duncan) at the time as “fanciful rot” and has been described to us since in evidence as “an unrealistic desktop exercise”—will the Prime Minister reconsider his understandable decision not to give oral evidence to us during the referendum campaign, so that the reach of the changes to the machinery of Government that he outlined earlier to the right hon. Member for Moray (Angus Robertson) can be properly assessed by the Committee?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
612 c895 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Armed forces Deployment Cabinet Defence equipment Intelligence services Iraq Legal opinion USA Iraq Committee of Inquiry Iraq conflict Military intervention Joint Intelligence Committee Conflict resolution Blair, Tony Weapons of mass destruction
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk