Proceeding contribution from Kelvin Hopkins (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Technical and Further Education Bill.
Technical and Further Education Bill
Although what the Minister is saying is correct, in that those apprentices will be paid, taking child benefit away from low-income families will be a disincentive for them to take up apprenticeships. Those families will be pressed to stay in education so that they can continue to get child benefit. Is that not the case?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 624 c714
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Child benefit Children in care Benefits rules Apprentices Governing bodies Further education Eligibility Vocational guidance Vocational education Social mobility University technical colleges Care leavers Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education
- Legislation
- Technical and Further Education Bill 2016-17
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 14:28:43 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-04-19/17041952001019
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-04-19/17041952001019
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-04-19/17041952001019