Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Gordon Marsden (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill on Technical and Further Education Bill.


Technical and Further Education Bill

I will give way in a little while. I want to make some progress on the main issue before giving way to the hon. Gentleman.

I am proud of the fact that the noble Lords considered the matter addressed in amendment 1, which I support, in considerable detail. In doing so, they revealed how much further the Government needed to go and, in my view, still need to go. In February, The Times Educational Supplement published an eloquent chart that spelled out in graphic detail the current gap in support between students and apprentices. It showed that apprentices have no access to care to learn grants, and that their families have no access to universal credit and council tax credit. Most trenchant and relevant when it comes to amendment 1, they have no access to child benefit.

Amendment 1 would enable families eligible for child benefit to receive it for children aged under 20 who are undertaking apprenticeships. The Opposition understand, as I am sure Government Members do, that it is not simply about the benefit itself, but the doors that that benefit opens to other benefits.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
624 c718 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Child benefit Children in care Benefits rules Apprentices Governing bodies Further education Eligibility Vocational guidance Vocational education Social mobility University technical colleges Care leavers Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education
Legislation
Technical and Further Education Bill 2016-17
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk