Proceeding contribution from Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 21 November 2018. It occurred during Debate on bill on Fisheries Bill.
Fisheries Bill
I agree with the Secretary of State, on behalf of the Scottish National party, about the damage the CFP did. However, the political text on the withdrawal agreement states that there will be:
“Cooperation…internationally to ensure fishing at sustainable levels, promote resource conservation… the development of measures for the conservation, rational management and regulation of fisheries… a new fisheries agreement on, inter alia, access to waters and quota shares”
and so on. That is the current form, in black and white. Although that might mean something new and better, is it not the case that, given the UK’s negotiating failures so far, what we will end up with will look very similar to the terms of the CFP?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 649 c898
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Common fisheries policy Devolution Borders Fisheries Licensing Fixed penalties Exports Environment protection Fishing catches Fishing limits Fishing vessels European Union Food Northern Ireland Manufacturing industries Technology Transitional arrangements Territorial waters Regeneration Quotas Total allowable catches Seafish Marine Management Organisation
- Legislation
- Fisheries Bill 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2019-06-27 14:46:26 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-21/18112140000008
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-21/18112140000008
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-11-21/18112140000008