Proceeding contribution from Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 January 2017. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill.
High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill
I did not want to intervene again, but I feel I must correct the impression that the noble Viscount is creating that we did not consider these issues. All the issues raised by the amendments were considered in depth. We were not restricted. We heard numerous petitions on the possible alternatives. In his opening contribution, the noble Viscount suggested that we somehow did not listen to parish councils. I assure him that we listened to them on many occasions. Inevitably, some were better than others. After some of the legal representation that we heard, I would have much preferred to hear from the parish councils again. The idea that because they did not have high-powered legal representation they were unable to make their case is not true. I just wanted to correct the impression that the Committee should look at this again because it was not given a proper searching examination by the Select Committee; it was.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 777 c89GC
- Session
- 2016-17
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Construction Environment Railway network High Speed 2 line
- Legislation
- High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill 2013-14 to 2016-17
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2021-10-12 15:14:02 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000181
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000181
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-10/17011088000181