Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 December 2018. It occurred during Debate on bill on Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill.


Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill

My Lords, the JCHR proposed a number of amendments on the subject of biometrics for the last stage. The Minister gave a long reply, quoting the Biometrics Commissioner’s support for bringing the periods for retention of data for arrest on suspicion of terrorism offences into line with arrests under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. At that stage, it seemed to me that this did not go to the question of oversight by the commissioner, and I still do not think that has really been dealt with.

I confess that I had to go by way of Beachy Head and along the byways of PACE to arrive at Amendment 30, so I am well prepared for criticisms of the drafting. However, it is intended to ensure that the retention of biometric data for a terrorism offence has consent from the commissioner. I am entirely open to a different way of achieving that end, but I am certain in my own mind that, whatever the basis of arrest, the retention of data should require this consent. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
794 c921 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Counter-terrorism Biometrics Detainees Borders Clothing Legal profession Finance Flags Legal opinion Powers of entry Powers Ports Proscribed organisations Right of search Radicalism Crimes outside national territories
Legislation
Counter-terrorism and Border Security Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk